Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Curses, Technology! And, A Letter to the Sullen Kid

The days in our dyad for 8th grade is beginning to wind down.  We've spent the last week on the computers, writing essays.  Well, the kids are supposed to be writing essays.

Much, MUCH to my dismay, I discovered that the students have all logged onto Gmail and Google Docs.  At first I was enthusiastic--students are often leading the way into technology!  Gmail and Google Docs are two of my favorite programs to use over the Internet.

My joy withered in the space it took for a few separate students, with quick glances at my approach, to minimize their windows on their email accounts.  Or more importantly, when the little chat boxes start blinking.  Or worse yet, when they say, "Oh, it's for the essay."

...

Your self-photograph is NOT for the essay.

Nor is the link you are sending to your friends to start chatting with you when my back is turned.

I find that old feelings of frustration well up within me.  Part of those feelings come from not being able to say authoritatively, "Five minutes from now, you will have all the files you need to download from Gmail or other email services.  Because I will see NO MORE EMAILS until the end of the period.  Opening unrelated email in class is a big red flag saying, 'I don't care what I'm supposed to be doing.' And if you don't care, then don't have to care. When you can't use something responsibly, you lose it."

The way I am thinking of treating unrelated email is the same as unrelated, passing notes.  If it's in my class, I get to see it.  (Someone know any privacy laws about this???)

I warned quite a few students in the class today about this.  If too many students are using this instead of a paper that is due in two days, and this is the only time to write it, then no, all the windows go.  It's automatic trouble.


Thankfully, the librarian and my dyad partner were aware of the situation too, and were able to keep an eye on them.  It's so strange, going from personable and joking one moment, to a warning and then a sharp shake of the head when the funny stops being funny.  I feel like I'm acting too harshly at times.


There was also one boy in class who is having problems with the school administration in general.  From what I heard, it saddens me and it frustrates me that he doesn't recognize or even want to talk about what's bothering him.


There's no forcing students to say anything, but there are things I thought about (while I was taking a shower, haha!) that I want this student to know:


"I know that right now, most of what we do in class looks pointless to you.  What's the point of writing essays on things you don't care about


What I do know, right now, is that all of this--papers, reading, brainstorming--is practice.  Practice for YOU, to become YOUR best advocate for what you want to do in life. 

What you're doing right now--the silence, the sneaking around, the deceiving--that's not advocating for yourself.  That's a tantrum.  Tantrums are for people who don't know what they can do with themselves when things aren't going their way.


If you don't tell us how we help you, then we're all stuck.


You're saying to us with your actions "So what?" So what if  you don't use any of the skills we are trying all together?  Another year will pass and you'll have new teachers.  You can say "So what?" to every single one of them if you really want.


And then you're gonna be out of school.  And you'll want something someday.  You know what question the world's gonna ask you? "So what?"  So what if you're eighteen.  So what if you're big, or strong, or fast, or a quick talker?  There's always someone coming who will be faster, stronger, taller, quicker, chattier, who does something better.  The one thing they can't outdo you in is being the truer you.  If you can't put those things together in a way that represents the BEST you, then the world's gonna pass you by.  It doesn't wait.


You've got to be your own best friend, your own hero, if you want to see the kind of life you wish you could live."

...I could say more.  In reality? The kid would probably have tuned out.  Nothing is more eye-rolling than a heartfelt speech.  I stand by it though.  If I don't mean what I say, then I'm not going to be a good teacher.  As some slogans have said, "Hope is a muscle."  School is supposed to be hope in action.  When it's not, that means we've missed something, our students have missed something, and we have to take the lead in rectifying it the best we can.

I'll stop being long-winded for now.  It's time for rest!


4 comments:

  1. I love what you said about being the truer you...powerful!

    I commiserate with your frustration; sometimes kids just don't seem get it! This has come up lately in relation to a host of experiences, including conversations I have had with teacher candidates in other programs, who are wrestling with the same issue.

    But allow me to push the conversation a little...if that's okay. If I'm way off base, let me know!

    Looking back, I was that kid once. In some ways, I still am. I was a good student, and had strong internalized motivation (because my parents passed on a strong work ethic to me). But I hated trying to think about/plan for the future- it stressed me out to think I had to know what I wanted to do with my life NOW, when I DIDN'T KNOW. I did my work because that's what I was supposed to do, but I do not know if I ever made the connection between school performance and "real life." I am sure some teachers probably mentioned it, and if you asked me, I could probably tell you that doing well in school would help me later in life; I just don't think it was part of my everyday thinking. It was "I need to pass this test so I can get a good grade," not "I need to study hard and learn this math so I can use it in college and when I have a job."

    I have heard that planning ahead is one of the later brain functions to develop, so I am wondering if part of the time, when kids don't seem to "get" that what they are supposed to be doing in school right now is important for their future success in life, it is because they really "don't get it." Maybe they are not completely ready for this developmentally. (Or am I making stuff up here?) Maybe a frank conversation with these students about this connection would help some of them, but if they struggle with planning ahead and visualizing the future, then again, maybe not. So I am wondering...what is another best way to reach kids? How can we get them inspired to do what we think they need to do to become the best people they can be?

    One thing that I have been thinking lately is that sometimes we have to go at it in a round-about way. We know what we want kids to do; we have to make them want to do it. We have to give them room to talk about what matters to them, and we have to relate our instruction to their lives now. We have to let them feel that they have a voice; we have to help them see that their voice can count. In terms of what we've been talking about in relation to literacy and to Routman, we have to give them an authentic audience. Just one thing I have been thinking lately; I am sure there are many other ways/methods to reach kids, too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Since I am a mom to 4 children who have all passed through this phase, I guess I see it in a different light (the not staying on task when at the computer). Teens and pre-teens are social and want to connect. They also like to push buttons. Put the class in front of the computer and they can do both at the same time!

    That doesn't mean that we, as teachers, stop trying, though. I know it can be frustrating, but hang in there!

    ReplyDelete
  3. @ E: You're right in that for most kids, 'right now' has very little to do with the future, especially when 'right now' is already too loaded and stressful. Since making my post I've heard more about this student's IEP. Knowing more about a student has made me change my mind again and again about what I really "know" about them, and really shows me what I still need to learn before I start prescribing the 'right' way of things.

    As for the students who goof off during our computer lab time? Well, their papers have the proof of their efforts. I can be a real stickler for written quality, and I know that they are still learning how to write well. On the other hand, knowing the students and knowing who was/wasn't on task does color my critique of their work. I keep my comments, though, strictly to the text and the rubric.

    "One thing that I have been thinking lately is that sometimes we have to go at it in a round-about way. We know what we want kids to do; we have to make them want to do it. We have to give them room to talk about what matters to them, and we have to relate our instruction to their lives now. We have to let them feel that they have a voice; we have to help them see that their voice can count."

    It's true. Older kids don't need the truth handed to them, since it means they don't have a say in it. And it's way too easy to blow off teacher advice or even earnestness as another "Disney moment". I remember feeling that in junior high. Yes, we have our work cut out for us in reaching them at a place where we can be open and heard.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @ GG: At the half-way point of that computer lab, I did let up and give them the benefit of the doubt that they WERE working, even if they were chatting left and right. The obvious things--talking too loudly, a VERY blank screen, checking their hair with the computer camera--those things I still asked them to knock off till lunch.

    I did learn that students were using outside sources in order to bolster their arguments, which made me glad I didn't swoop in like the SWAT to get them back to work. I'm well aware of my own zoning out while still working on my own homework, so I can give them that same chance too.

    ReplyDelete